Lu v. Smith et al
| Friedrich Lu |
| Diane Smith, Thomas G. Robbins, Trustees of Boston University, Jane Doe, Nicole M. O'Connor and City of Boston |
| 1:2015cv14081 |
| December 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Suffolk |
| Denise J. Casper |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Court GRANTS Smith and BU's motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) as to Count I against BU, as to Count I for the equal protection and substantive due process claims against Smit h, and as to Count III against BU and Smith and dismisses those claims. The Court DENIES the motion as to the procedural due process claim asserted in Count I against Smith and as to Count II against both BU and Smith. Lu shall properly serve an ame nded complaint that eliminates the struck claims onto the Defendants consistent with the requirements of Rule 4 and must do so before September 23, 2016. Accordingly, the Court DENIES the motion pursuant Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(5) without prejudice. For the reasons stated above, Smith and BU's motion to dismiss, D. 12, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Lu's opposition to this motion, crafted as a motion to strike the motion to dismiss, D. 17, is DENIED. (Hourihan, Lisa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
