Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Moynihan et al
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company |
James P. Moynihan and Durham Commercial Capital Corp. |
1:2015cv14155 |
December 16, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Boston Office |
Essex |
Indira Talwani |
All Other Real Property |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 83 Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ORDER entered. FINAL JUDGMENT. (Patton, Christine) |
Filing 80 Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Re: Plaintiff Deutsche Bank National Trust Company's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry # 63 ). The motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry # 63 ) is ALLOWED as to counts one and two. DBNTC is directed to file a proposed final judgment within seven days of the date of this opinion. (Patton, Christine) |
Filing 41 Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Re: Defendant James P. Moynihan's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Docket Entry # 9 ); Defendant James P. Moynihan's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Docket Entry # 11 ). The Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss (Docket Entry # 9 ) and the Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss (Docket Entry # 11 ) are DENIED. This court will conduct a scheduling conference on August 8, 2016 at 2:45 p.m. (Patton, Christine) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.