Sheffield v. City of Boston et al
| Carla Sheffield |
| City of Boston, Matthew Pieroway, Joel Resil, Michael Moes 1-10 and Mary Moes 1-10 |
| 1:2015cv14174 |
| December 18, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Suffolk |
| Nathaniel M. Gorton |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
115
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. "For the foregoing reasons, defendant Resils motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 84) is ALLOWED with respect to:1) the seizure, exit order and pursuit claims under the Fourth A mendment;2) the medical care claim under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments;3) the equal protection claim under the Fourteenth Amendment;4) the IIED claim under Massachusetts law; and5) the exit order claim under Massachusetts law.With respect to t he excessive force and assault and battery claims, Resils motion for summary judgment is DENIED.Defendant Pieroways motion for partial summary judgment (Docket No. 87) is, with respect to the federal constitutional claims other than the excessive force claim, ALLOWED, but is otherwise DENIED." (Lima, Christine)
|
|
Filing
41
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDERFor the forgoing reasons, defendants motion to strike (Docket No. 32) is: 1) with respect to paragraphs 28 through 33 of plaintiffs amended complaint (Docket No. 26), DEN IED; 2) with respect to the Northeastern study in paragraph 34 of plaintiffs amended complaint (Docket No. 26), DENIED, but, with respect to the citation to the National Bureau of Economic Research study in paragraph 34, ALLOWED< /b>; 3) with respect to paragraph 35 of plaintiffs amended complaint (Docket No. 26), ALLOWED; 4) with respect to paragraphs 36 through 52 of plaintiffs amended complaint (Docket No. 26), DENIED; 5) with respect to paragraphs 53 through 60 of plaintiffs amended complaint (Docket No. 26), ALLOWED;Defendants shall file any supplemental responsive pleadings deemed necessary on or before Monday, November 14, 2016. So ordered.(Caruso, Stephanie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
