Horan et al v. Cabral et al
| John Horan |
| Andrea J. Cabral, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Suffolk County Sheriff's Department, NaphCare, Inc., Lemuel Shattuck Hospital, James Cheverie, John Doe Nurse, John Doe PA, John Doe M.D. and John Doe Private Agency |
| 1:2016cv10359 |
| February 19, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Suffolk |
| George A. OToole |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Re: Defendants Naphcare, Inc. and Dr. James Cheverie's Motion for Referral to a Medical Malpractice Tribunal (Docket Entry # 21 ). The motion to refer the negligence and medical malpractice claims to Massachusetts Superior Court to convene a medical malpractice tribunal (Docket Entry # 21 ) is ALLOWED. (Patton, Christine)
|
|
Filing
34
Judge George A. OToole, Jr: OPINION AND ORDER entered granting 31 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Lyness, Paul)
|
|
Filing
28
Judge George A. O'Toole, Jr: ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS entered finding as moot 14 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 16 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE 21 Motion for Referral to Medical Malpractice Tribunal; GRANTING 25 Motion to Amend Complaint (Halley, Taylor)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
