Kersey v Becton Dickinson and Co.
Plaintiff: George E. Kersey
Defendant: Becton Dickinson and Co.
Case Number: 1:2016cv10495
Filed: March 10, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Middlesex
Presiding Judge: Leo T. Sorokin
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 52 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER OF ENJOINMENT entered. (PSSA, 4)
December 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 50 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. George E. Kersey shall, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, show cause, in writing, why he should not be enjoined from filing any pleadings or documents concerning Becton Dickinson and Co. without first obtaining permission from the Court. If George E. Kersey fails to respond or his response does not provide a valid basis for why the filing injunction should not issue, the Court will enter an Order enjoining the plaintiff from filing any new lawsuits, pleadings documents against Becton Dickinson and Co. without first obtaining the Court's permission. (PSSA, 4)
August 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 19 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered granting 12 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting 15 Motion for Sanctions; denying 17 Motion to Strike AND Renewed Motion for Default Judgment. If Kersey wishes to pursue this action, he must, within 21 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, show cause, in writing, as to why the remainder of his complaint is not subject to dismissal, or he shall file an amended complaint that cures the pleading deficie ncies of the original complaint, as outlined herein. Any such amended complaint shall not include any third party beneficiary claims against Becton Dickinson. Failure to comply withthis Order will result in dismissal of the action. No summonses shall issue pending further Order of the Court. A copy of this Order has been mailed via first class mail to the Plaintiff. (Montes, Mariliz)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kersey v Becton Dickinson and Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: George E. Kersey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Becton Dickinson and Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?