Terrie Banhazl v. The American Ceramic Society et al
Plaintiff: Terrie Banhazl
Defendant: The American Ceramic Society, Justin Rothshank and Bel Inc.
Case Number: 1:2016cv10791
Filed: April 28, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Essex
Presiding Judge: Allison D. Burroughs
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 182 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered granting in part and denying in part 168 Motion to Alter Judgment. (McManus, Caetlin)
May 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 166 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. (McManus, Caetlin)
March 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 71 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. Plaintiff's motion to strike, [ECF No. 59 ], is GRANTED, and Defendant's motion for summary judgment, [ECF No. 64 ], is DENIED. The Court strikes portions of paragr aphs 59, 62, 76, 78, 82, 83, 87, and 88 of Burkett's Invalidity Report and paragraphs 26, 29, 33, 39, 40, 41, 42, 44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62, 64, 66, 68, 70, 72, 74, and 78 of Burkett's Rebuttal Report to the extent these paragraphs and any related testimony rely on a meaning of the word "evaporate" that is inconsistent with this Court's construction of that term. SO ORDERED. (McDonagh, Christina)
July 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 46 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. The claim terms at issue will be construed for the jury and for all other purposes in this litigation in a manner consistent with the above rulings of the Court. For ease of reference, the C ourt's constructions are reproduced below in Appendix A.(See Attached Order) Within seven days of this Order, the parties shall submit a joint status report stating their mutual or respective positions concerning whether the scheduling order in this matter [ECF No. 21 ] should be amended. Unless the Court issues a new scheduling order, the existing deadlines for fact discovery, expert discovery, and dispositive motions control. SO ORDERED.(McDonagh, Christina)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Terrie Banhazl v. The American Ceramic Society et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The American Ceramic Society
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Justin Rothshank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bel Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terrie Banhazl
Represented By: Lucia A. Passanisi
Represented By: Catherine I. Rajwani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?