Gorham v. Vidal
Petitioner: Kyron Gorham
Respondent: Osvaldo Vidal
Case Number: 1:2016cv10822
Filed: May 2, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Bristol
Presiding Judge: Douglas P. Woodlock
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 34 Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered granting 31 Motion to Amend and granting 23 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, as amended; given the judgment on the pleadings the court finds moot 25 the petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel and 32 the petitioner's Motion for Hearing. (Woodlock, Douglas)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gorham v. Vidal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kyron Gorham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Osvaldo Vidal
Represented By: Ryan E. Ferch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?