Babcock v. Carlotto et al
| Ryan P. Babcock |
| Adam J. Carlotto, Fairview Hospital, John J. Dubois, Christopher Clark and Adrian Elliot |
| 1:2016cv10951 |
| May 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Middlesex |
| Indira Talwani |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered. For the reasons set forth in the attached Order: Plaintiffs Motion for Stay 19 is DENIED as moot. laintiffs Motion for the Appointment of Counsel 20 is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff's Response to Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Fairview Hospital, Christopher Clark, MD, and Adrian Elliot, MD 16 , and Defendant, Adam J. Carlotto's, Motion to Dismiss 17 is due October 17, 2016.(MacDonald, Gail)
|
|
Filing
5
Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered denying 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; granting without prejudice 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall issue summonses as to all defendants. The plaintiff is responsible for servi ng the summonses, complaint, and this order on the defendants in compliance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 4.1. Service must be completed within 90 days of the date of this order. Because the plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, he may elect to have service completed by the United States Marshals Service. (PSSA, 3)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
