Rose v. Bank of America as the Successor-in-Interest of Countrywide Mortgage et al
Bruce Rose |
Bank of America as the Successor-in-Interest of Countrywide Mortgage, Option One and Eastside Mortgage |
1:2016cv11558 |
July 28, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Boston Office |
Suffolk |
F. Dennis Saylor |
All Other Real Property |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE AS UNRIPE(Halley, Taylor) |
Filing 48 Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER VACATING THE COURTS APRIL 2017 ORDER IN PART, REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING, AND DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. The Court's April 17, 2017 Order is VACATED i n part. Counts 3 and 4 of the complaint are hereby reinstated. The parties are ORDERED to file supplemental briefing on the issue of justiciability according to the following schedule: plaintiff shall file a memorandum on or before December 28, 2017, and defendants shall file a responsive memorandum by January 12, 2018. The motion for summary judgment is DENIED without prejudice.(Pezzarossi, Lisa) |
Filing 32 Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered denying 28 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. (Zaleski, Christine) |
Filing 27 Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER on Motion to Dismiss. (Zaleski, Christine). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.