United States of America v. Tisbury Towing and Transportation Co. Inc. et al
| United States of America |
| Tug M/V Thuban, Barge HYDRA 1200 and Tisbury Towing and Transportation, Inc. |
| 1:2016cv11857 |
| September 12, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Dukes |
| Leo T. Sorokin |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. Tisbury's 90 Motion in Limine are DENIED as moot. The Court awards damages to the United States in the amount of $490,681.28 plus prejudgment interest. This amount includes $43 8,000 for the first contract awarded to Kovilic to repair the Hurricane Barrier, less a $25,000 reduction for the ten wooden fenders not shown to be present at the time of the allision, for an adjusted amount of $413,000. Because this amoun t is 40.98 percent less than the amount the Corps spent to repair the Hurricane Barrier, the Court awards the same proportion of the Corps's internal overhead costs, or $77,681.28. The total award is therefore $490,681.28 plus prejudgm ent interest.By August 1, 2019, the government shall, after conferring with the defendant, submit a proposed form of judgment that includes a calculation of prejudgment interest on the amount awarded herein as described above.(Montes, Mariliz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
