Lopez v. City of Somerville et al
Cecelia Lopez |
City of Somerville, George Scarpelli, Anthony Pierantozzi and Joseph Curtatone |
1:2016cv11877 |
September 15, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Boston Office |
Middlesex |
Leo T. Sorokin |
Civil Rights: Education |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 83 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered granting 61 Somerville's Motion for Reconsideration on Order of 35 MOTION for Summary Judgment re. Count I and denying 77 Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration on Order of 35 MOTION for Summary Judgment against them re. Counts V, VI and VII. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Defendants on all claims with each side to bear its own fees and costs. (Montes, Mariliz) |
Filing 55 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. 35 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Count I and ALLOWED as to all other remaining counts (Counts II-XI). The Court shall hold a Status Conference on Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 2:00 PM. The remaining parties SHALL be prepared to discuss: a) trial duration, b) trial scheduling, c) whether the parties consent to the exercise of jurisdiction of the magistrate judge (the parties shall not report individual positions and no adverse consequence will result from declining to consent), and d) whether the parties wish to engage in mediation with the Courts mediation program prior to trial.(see attached Order) (Montes, Mariliz) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.