Diaz v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al
| Juan Diaz, Jr |
| Massachusetts Department of Correction, Thomas Turco, Carol Micci, Douglas Cabral and Christopher Fallon |
| 1:2016cv11894 |
| September 22, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| M. Page Kelley |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered.After de novo review of the 42 Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Kelley and consideration of the objections filed by the Plaintiff (Doc. Nos. 44, 45 & 46), the Court hereby ADOPTS t he 42 Report and Recommendation and ALLOWS the 39 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Turco. Because Turco is the only defendant (remaining) that has appeared in the case and the record does not reveal successful service of any other defendant, the Clerk shall mail to Plaintiff a copy of the docket reflecting this Order and close this case. A copy of this Order has been mailed to the Plaintiff. (Montes, Mariliz)
|
|
Filing
15
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered The unobjected to 12 Report and Recommendation, after de novo review, is ADOPTED. The recommendations set forth on page 4 (numbered 1 to 7) are adopted as Orders of the Court. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Kelley for all purposes. (Montes, Mariliz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
