Malden Transportation, Inc. et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
| Malden Transportation, Inc., PEGM Transportation, LLC, Medford Trans., Inc., Everett Car Service, Inc., Talkd Transp., Inc., Argon Cab, Inc., Cedar Cab, Inc., Cobalt Cab, Inc., Evergreen Cab, Inc., Fleet Leasing, Inc., Greenway Leasing, Inc., Harbor Leasing, Inc., Harvest Cab, Inc., Monument Leasing, Inc., Mystic Leasing, Inc., Pearl Cab, Inc., Sam's Cab, Inc., Triton Cab, Inc., Union Cab, Inc., Veita Cab, Inc., West End Leasing, Inc., Green Cab Co., Inc., Green Automotive, Inc., Country Club Trans., Inc., Lochmere Taxi, Inc., Mt. Pleasant Taxi, Inc., Cinema Taxi, Inc., Green & Yellow TNC, Alewife Trans. Co., Inc., Eastern Trans., Inc., Silcor Trans. Co., Inc., Ormond Trans. Co., Inc., Somerville Trans. Co., Inc. and Babs Cab, Inc. |
| Uber Technologies, Inc., Governor Charles Baker and Commonwealth of Massachusetts |
| 1:2016cv12538 |
| December 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Middlesex |
| Nathaniel M. Gorton |
| Antitrust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
652
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION: For the foregoing reasons, defendants are found not to have violated Chapter 93A or plaintiffs common law claims. Accordingly, judgment will enter for defendants.So ordered.(Vieira, Leonardo) Modified on 9/6/2019 to fix docket text (Vieira, Leonardo).
|
|
Filing
554
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. For the foregoing reasons, plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on defendants' Chapter 93A, § 3 affirmative defense (Docket No. 367, Part II) is ALLOWED.< /b> Otherwise, the cross motions for summary judgment (Docket Nos. 357, 367) are DENIED. At the jury-waived trial, which will be subject to time limitations, the Court will consider the following issues: 1) Whether Uber act ed egregiously when it violated the Taxi Rules in violation of Chapter 93A; 2) Whether plaintiffs suffered economic damages; 3) Whether Uber's alleged unfairness/egregious conduct caused plaintiffs' damages; 4) Whether Uber aided and abetted unfair conduct and/or engaged in a civil conspiracy to compete unfairly; 5) Whether Uber adequately provided plaintiffs with notice of its res judicata defense; and 6) Whether the EJT plaintiffs and the Anoush plaintiffs are in privity. Furthermore, a pre-trial conference will be held on Wednesday, July 17, 2019, at 11:00 A.M. and the bench trial will commence on Thursday, July 18, 2019, at 9:00 A.M. SO ORDERED. (Pacho, Arnold) Modified docket text on 7/3/2019 (Pacho, Arnold).
|
|
Filing
153
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER.For the foregoing reasons, defendants' partial motion to dismiss the antitrust claims in the Malden, Dot Ave, Max Luc and Taxi Maintenance amended complaint (Docket No. 109 ) is ALLOWED.So ordered. (Franklin, Yvonne)
|
|
Filing
96
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDERFor the foregoing reasons, the motion to dismiss of defendants Travis Kalanick and Garrett Camp (Docket No. 70), is ALLOWED and the consolidated motion to dismiss of de fendants Uber, Travis Kalanick and Garrett Camp (Docket No. 72) is, with respect to the claims of antitrust violation and interference with advantageous business relationships and the Taxi Maintenance claim of civil conspiracy, ALLOWED, but is otherwise DENIED.The following claims of the named plaintiffs remain pending:1) the claims of all plaintiffs for unfair competition under the common law and M.G.L. c. 93A § 11.2) the claims of the Anoush plaintiffs for:a) aiding and abetting unfair competition in violation of the common law and M.G.L. c. 93A, andb) civil conspiracy to commit unfair competition in violation of the common law and M.G.L. c. 93A.So ordered.(Caruso, Stephanie)
|
|
Filing
52
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered re Case Consolidation. See attached order.Associated Cases: 1:16-cv-12538-NMG et al.(Caruso, Stephanie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
