Kersey v. American Honda Finance Corporation et al
| George E. Kersey |
| American Honda Finance Corporation and Herb Chambers 1189, Inc |
| 1:2016cv12631 |
| December 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Middlesex |
| F. Dennis Saylor |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered granting 80 Motion for Attorney Fees Defendant is awarded $46,144.48 in damages and attorneys' fees and costs.(FDS, law1)
|
|
Filing
77
Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDERPlaintiffs motion for summary judgment is DENIED, defendants motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and defendants motion for sanctions is DENIED as moot. Defendant is further directed to file with the Court by May 11, 2018, a statement showing how the $13,404.80 sought in damages was calculated. With respect to the award of attorneys fees and costs, defendant is further directed to file a memorandum and supporting affidavits and exhibits by May 11, 2018; any opposition to defendants memorandum shall be filed by May 25, 2018; and any reply memoranda to oppositions shall be filed by June 1, 2018.(FDS, law1)
|
|
Filing
71
Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered denying 66 Motion for Summary Judgment (Halley, Taylor) (Main Document 71 replaced on 2/21/2018) (Halley, Taylor).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
