Gambino et al v. Radiant Electric, LLC et al
| Richard P. Gambino, Local 103, I.B.E.W. Health Benefit Plan, Electrical Workers' Pension Fund, Local 103, I.B.E.W., Electrical Workers' Deferred Income Fund, Local 103, I.B.E.W., Joint Apprenticeship and Training Fund, Lawrence J. Bradley and National Electrical Benefit Fund |
| Radiant Electric, LLC |
| People's United Bank, N.A. |
| 1:2017cv10034 |
| January 9, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Suffolk |
| Allison D. Burroughs |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 185 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered granting 24 Motion for Order. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs motion for order of post-judgment attachment by trustee process ECF No. 24 is GRANTED. The Court hereby approves an attachment on trustee process in the amount of $104,639.23 on the bank accounts of Defendant Radiant Electric, LLC maintained at Peoples United Bank, N.A. A summons to trustee shall issue from the Court. SO ORDERED. (McDonagh, Christina)
|
|
Filing
19
Judge Allison D. Burroughs: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The amended motion for a default judgment ECF No. 15 is GRANTED.Default judgment shall hereby enter against Radiant in the amount of $104,639.23.(McDonagh, Christina)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
