Evans et al v. Daikin North America LLC et al
Bruce Evans and Bridgitt Evans |
Daikin North America LLC and Daikin Applied Americas, Inc. |
1:2017cv10108 |
January 23, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Boston Office |
Suffolk |
Richard G. Stearns |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 95 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered granting in part and denying in part 60 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 69 Motion for Summary Judgment Daikin AA and Daikin NA's motions for summary judgment on all counts are ALLOWED. DACA Trust's motion for summary judgment is ALLOWED in part with respect to Count I claims of breach of express warranty and breach of implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, but is otherwise DENIED. The Clerk will enter judgmen t for Daikin AA and Daikin NA on all claims, and set the remainder of the case for trial to a jury. It is the court's intention to consolidate this case with Egans v. Daikin North America, LLC et al. (17-11630), given the high de gree of similarity of claims and parties. Each party is directed to file, by February 11, 2019, an estimate of the amount of time that they will require to try the case, inclusive of the party's own cross-examination and re-direct, exclusive of opening and closing arguments and jury voir dire. The parties should bear in mind that the court schedules trials to run from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. each day. (RGS, law1) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.