United States v. $36,000 in United States Currency Seized From Zachary J. Battaini at Boston Logan International Airport on November 26, 2016
Plaintiff: United States
Defendant: $36,000 in United States Currency Seized From Zachary J. Battaini at Boston Logan International Airport on November 26, 2016
Case Number: 1:2017cv10609
Filed: April 10, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Suffolk
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Stearns
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 21 U.S.C. ยง 881
Jury Demanded By: None
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States v. $36,000 in United States Currency Seized From Zachary J. Battaini at Boston Logan International Airport on November 26, 2016
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States
Represented By: Eve A. Piemonte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: $36,000 in United States Currency Seized From Zachary J. Battaini at Boston Logan International Airport on November 26, 2016
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?