Nagy v. Naday et al
| Tamas Nagy |
| Judit Naday, Viktoria Dovak, Marta Klara Szucs, Marta Dobi, Ildiko Bleszkanne Kis, Eva Maria Gosztola Molnar, Judit Gallone Nagy, Piroska Kovacs, Janos Kovacs, Maria Cecilia Kovacs, Mihaly Szabo, Gyorgy Sohr, Eszter Kocsisne Hodosi, Terez Toth, Krisztina Gulyas, Agnes Seben Hanuska, Emoke Csaszar. P, Ildiko Lakatos, Ilona Tamas, Felicitasz Szeman, Istvan Simicz, AnnaMaria Ferenczy, Jozsef Kovacs, Agnes Juzane Szabo, Antalne Szogi, John Doe, Jane Doe, Laszlo Takacs, Jozsefne Simon and Andrea Karpatine Elsner |
| 1:2017cv10613 |
| April 10, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Norfolk |
| Leo T. Sorokin |
| Assault, Libel, and Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
135
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES the action as to Defendant Javorszky. Nagy's motion to take judicial notice of certain information (Doc. No. 105) is DENIED for reasons already stated, see supra n.2. The pending motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction (Doc. Nos. 119, 121) are ALLOWED for reasons already stated. The pending motions for leave to amend plaintiff's opposition (Doc. No. 131) and for entry of default (Doc. No. 134) are DENIED AS MOOT in light of the foregoing. A judgment of dismissal shall enter. (Montes, Mariliz)
|
|
Filing
90
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. Naday's motion to dismiss, Doc. No. 66, is ALLOWED. The Court reminds Nagy that, by July 26, 2019, he shall file (1) a certified English translation of Doc. Nos. 82, 83, 84, 85, and 86 and (2) a memorandum that describes each document and explains the process by which Nagy obtained the documents for each defendant.( Nagy's filing due by 7/26/2019)(Montes, Mariliz)
|
|
Filing
56
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. "...Nagy's filing states that he voluntarily dismisses the suit against Janos Kovacs and Marta Klara Szucs. Doc. No. 55 at 1. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED as to those two defendants. Nagys filing also requests to add two new defendants. Id. The Court construes this request as a motion for leave to file an amended complaint naming additional defendants. That motion is DENIED. The case will proceed only against the defendant s named in the complaint, Doc. No. 1, less those whom Nagy has voluntarily dismissed.""...by May 30, 2019, Nagy shall file a status report that, for each remaining defendant, either (1) establishes proof of proper Hague Convention service on that defendant or (2) shows good cause why this case should not be dismissed against that defendant in the continued absence of such proof. Given that this case has been pending for nearly two years, and the Courts Order allowing service through the Hague Convention issued more than a year ago, the Court warns Nagy that it anticipates dismissing this matter with prejudice on May 31, 2019,against each defendant for whom the Court has received neither proof of proper Hague Convention service nor a showing of good cause for the lack of proof." SO ORDERED.( Status Report due by 5/30/2019)(A copy of this Order has been mailed to the Plaintiff.)(Montes, Mariliz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
