Patoski v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Susan W. Patoski
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 1:2017cv10799
Filed: May 5, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Essex
Presiding Judge: Nathaniel M. Gorton
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 24 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER.In accordance with the foregoing, plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings for a reversal or remand of the Comissioner's decision (Docket No. 11 ) is DENIED and defendant's motion for an order affirming the decision of the Commissioner (Docket No. 21 ) is ALLOWED.So ordered. (Franklin, Yvonne)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patoski v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Susan W. Patoski
Represented By: Ronald B. Eskin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?