Hale et al v. Pan Am Railways, Inc. et al
| Michael Hale and Alla Hale |
| Pan Am Railways, Inc., Americold Logistics LLC and Cryo-Trans, Inc. |
| 1:2017cv10855 |
| May 15, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Middlesex |
| Nathaniel M. Gorton |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
147
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Pan Am's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 119 ) is DENIED. For the reasons set forth at the settlement approval hearing, the Motions to Approve Third Party Settlement (Docket Nos. 134 & 135 ) are ALLOWED. So ordered. (Vieira, Leonardo)
|
|
Filing
96
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered DENYING without prejudice 64 Motion for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54(b); Report and Recommendations accepted and adopted re 90 Report and Recommendations. (Vieira, Leonardo)
|
|
Filing
43
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, defendant Pan Ams motion to dismiss (Docket No. 18 ) is DENIED and defendant Cryo-Transs motion to dismiss (Docket No. 20 ) is ALLOWED. Plaintiffs are permitted to file an amended complaint as to defendant Cryo-Trans, if at all, on or before Friday, April 20, 2018.So ordered.(Franklin, Yvonne)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
