Logie v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority et al
Plaintiff: Rosalind Logie
Defendant: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Boston Carmen's Union and Local 589
Case Number: 1:2017cv10949
Filed: May 23, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Norfolk
Presiding Judge: Patti B. Saris
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1218
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 42 Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered. " For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, I dismiss the other claims as well. The action is DISMISSED. " re 35 Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley: ORDER entered. REPORT AN D RECOMMENDATIONS re 10 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Scott C. Andrews, Norman W. Michaud Recommendation: "For the above reasons, the court RECOMMENDS that the MBTA defendants' motion to dismiss be G RANTED in part and DENIED in part. All claims against defendants Andrews and Michaud in their official and individual capacities should be dismissed. All claims against the MBTA, except for plaintiff's claim for violation of Title II of the ADA should be dismissed." (Coppola, Katelyn) Modified on 8/3/2018 due to clerical error regarding related docket entry (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/3/2018: # 1 Report and Recommendations) (Coppola, Katelyn).
August 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered denying without prejudice 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel; granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall issue summonses as to all defendants. Service must be completed within 90 days of the date of this order. Because the plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, she may elect to have service completed by the United States Marshals Service (USMS). If the plaintiff chooses to have service completed by the USMS, she shall provide the agency with all papers for service on the defendants and a completed USM-285 form for each party to be served. The Clerk shall provide the plaintiff with forms and instructions for service. (PSSA, 4)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Logie v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rosalind Logie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boston Carmen's Union
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Local 589
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?