Decarvalho v. Telford et al
| Janito Decarvalho |
| Erik Telford, Michael McCarthy, Carlton Jackson, Francis Wells, Steven Connolly, Stephen Johnson, Walter Foley, Paul Wolfe, Kenneth Legrice, Joseph Cummings, Mathew Hannigan, Gregory Furtado, Eric Resende, Gregory Federico, City of Brockton, Brockton Police Department, Massachusetts State Police and Unknown Person |
| 1:2017cv11224 |
| June 30, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Plymouth |
| Marianne B. Bowler |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendants' motions, D. 16, 42, are ALLOWED.(Hourihan, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
7
Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered denying without prejudice 2 Motion to Appoint Special Process Server; denying without prejudice 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel; granting 4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pa uperis and assessing an initial partial filing fee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)(A), with the remainder of the fee to be assessed and collected in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The Complaint is subject to dismissal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2), 1915A(b)(1), (2). If plaintiff wishes to pursue this action, he must, within forty-two (42) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order, file an amended complaint. (PSSA, 4)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
