Tubens v. Doe et al
| Alexis Tubens |
| Angel Miguel Beltre Tejada, William Evans and City of Boston |
| 1:2017cv11388 |
| July 28, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Suffolk |
| Leo T. Sorokin |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
121
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. 109 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to October 31, 2019 to Serve 2nd Amended Complaint must be DENIED for lack of excusable neglect. For this reason, the Court must also ALLOW the 104 City of Boston' s Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk shall close the case.(Montes, Mariliz)
|
|
Filing
117
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 104) AND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (DOC. NO. 109) entered. Accordingly, the Motion to Extend (Doc. No. 109) is DENIED AS MOOT as to Officer Sullivan. The Motion to Dismiss (Doc . No.104) is ALLOWED as to Officer Sullivan because Plaintiff not only failed to effectuate service on him within the time provided by this Courts Order but also failed to effectuate service within the proposed extended time period or to date.Rega rding Officer Columbo, Plaintiff appears to have effectuated proper service during the proposed extended period for service. Because the operative complaint sues Officer Columbo in his individual and official capacities and the motion to amend the Co mplaint was not served upon him or his counsel, prior to ruling on the pending motions to dismiss and extend as to Officer Columbo, the Court will provide Officer Columbo an opportunity to file a response to the pending motions. Any such response sha ll be filed by December 13, 2019. Plaintiffs counsel shall mail a copy of this Order to Officer Columbo and shall provide it by mail and email to the attorney that represented Officer Columbo at his deposition. re 104 Motion to Dismiss; 109 Motion for Extension of Time (Simeone, Maria)
|
|
Filing
18
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered denying as moot 6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying without prejudice 13 Motion for Discovery; granting 15 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend; denying as moot 17 Motion to Stay of Discovery. The Defendant City and Defendant Evans shall either (1) answer Interrogatories 2 and 3 appearing on page 2 of Doc. 13-1 by November 30, 2017 or (2) file an objection, by November 21, 2017, stating the basis for objecting to this narrow third party discovery. (Montes, Mariliz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
