Dorris v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
| Anna Dorris |
| Howmedica Osteonics Corp and Stryker Corp |
| 1:2017cv11736 |
| September 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Indira Talwani |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Judge Indira Talwani: MDL ORDERS NO. 1-9,11&12 AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1 entered. (Attachments: #1 Case Management Order No. 1)(Jones, Sherry) |
| Filing 10 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Indira Talwani assigned to case. (Jones, Sherry) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL: Pursuant to CTO Number: 16, MDL No. 2768 has been transferred from Middle District of Tennessee and assigned civil action number: 17-11736. Middle District of Tennessee case number: 17-1182. In Re: Striker Orthopaedics LFIT V40 Femoral Head Products Liability Litigation (Jones, Sherry) |
| Filing 8 Case transferred in from District of Tennessee Middle; Case Number 3:17-cv-01182. |
Filing 7
ORDER: Pursuant to the Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-16) of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Docket No. 2768, this case is hereby transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts for coordinated or consolidated proceedings. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case and electronically transmit the record to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 9/12/2017. (ab)
|
| Filing 6 Certified Copy of Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-16) received from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, MDL 2768. (The case is ready for closing/transfer; Proposed order submitted to chambers.) (af) |
| Filing 5 Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-16) filed by the UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION, IN RE: STRYKER LFIT V40 FEMORAL HEAD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2768. Case transferred to the District of Massachusetts. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. (af) |
| Filing 4 Summons issued as to Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Corp. (Service copies mailed to counsel) (ab) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ab) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (ab) |
| State Bar status verified as active for Timothy J. Shalvey (TN), Timothy Holton (TN), John R. Holton (TN), Daniel A. Nigh (FL). (ab) |
| NOTICE TO COUNSEL Timothy Holton, John R. Holton: WITHIN 21 DAYS, counsel shall be admitted to practice. The application for admission is available on the website at #http://www.tnmd.uscourts.gov/files/applicationforadmission3.pdf (LR 83.01(a)). Admission due by 9/13/2017. (ab) |
| NOTICE TO COUNSEL Daniel A. Nigh: WITHIN 21 DAYS, counsel shall file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, a Certificate of Good Standing signed by the Clerk of a United States District Court where admitted, and pay a fee of $75.00 (LR 83.01(d)). PHV due by 9/13/2017. (ab) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Corp., filed by Anna Dorris. ($400 filing fee paid on-line) (Attachments: #1 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet)(ab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
