Friends of Ruth & Emily, Inc. v. City of New Bedford

Justia Dockets & Filings First Circuit Massachusetts District Court Friends of Ruth & Emily, Inc. v. City of New Bedford

Friends of Ruth & Emily, Inc. v. City of New Bedford

Plaintiff:	Friends of Ruth & Emily, Inc.
Defendant:	City of New Bedford
Case Number:	1:2017cv11809
Filed:	September 21, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office:	Boston Office
County:	Bristol
Presiding Judge:	William G. Young
Nature of Suit:	Environmental Matters
Cause of Action:	16 U.S.C. § 1538
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 24, 2019	Filing 91 Judge William G. Young: ORDER entered. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW"For these reasons, the Court finds and rules that there has been no violation of the Endangered Species Act. Judgment shall enter for the City.SO ORDERED."(Sonnenberg, Elizabeth)
September 25, 2018	Filing 34 Judge William G. Young: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER"For the foregoing reasons, the Court finds that Rowley has sufficiently demonstrated standing to pursue her claims. New Bedfords motion to dismiss, ECF No. 7 , is DENIED. This case has already dragged on far too long. Since Rowley seeks preliminary injunctive relief, it is appropriate in this instance that such hearing be joined with trial on the merits pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a). The Court will convene a status conference as soon as possible to set an early trial date.SO ORDERED."(Sonnenberg, Elizabeth)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 24, 2019

Filing 91 Judge William G. Young: ORDER entered. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW"For these reasons, the Court finds and rules that there has been no violation of the Endangered Species Act. Judgment shall enter for the City.SO ORDERED."(Sonnenberg, Elizabeth)

September 25, 2018

Filing 34 Judge William G. Young: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER"For the foregoing reasons, the Court finds that Rowley has sufficiently demonstrated standing to pursue her claims. New Bedfords motion to dismiss, ECF No. 7 , is DENIED. This case has already dragged on far too long. Since Rowley seeks preliminary injunctive relief, it is appropriate in this instance that such hearing be joined with trial on the merits pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a). The Court will convene a status conference as soon as possible to set an early trial date.SO ORDERED."(Sonnenberg, Elizabeth)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Friends of Ruth & Emily, Inc. v. City of New Bedford
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Friends of Ruth & Emily, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: City of New Bedford
Represented By:	Kreg R. Espinola
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?