COMERICA BANK & TRUST, N.A. as Personal Representative of the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson v. HABIB

Justia Dockets & Filings First Circuit Massachusetts District Court COMERICA BANK & TRUST, N.A. as Personal Representative of the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson v. HABIB

COMERICA BANK & TRUST, N.A. as Personal Representative of the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson v. HABIB

Plaintiff:	COMERICA BANK & TRUST, N.A.
Defendant:	KIAN ANDREW HABIB
Case Number:	1:2017cv12418
Filed:	December 7, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office:	Boston Office
County:	Middlesex
Presiding Judge:	Leo T. Sorokin
Nature of Suit:	Copyrights
Cause of Action:	17 U.S.C. § 101
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 14, 2020	Filing 118 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered.The Court ALLOWS Comerica's motion to Dismiss Count II of the Amended Complaint and CANCELS the trial currently scheduled for March 2, 2020. Comerica shall file any request for an award of attorneys' fees and costs within 21 days of the issuance of this Order. (Montes, Mariliz)
January 6, 2020	Filing 111 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. 77 Comerica's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is ALLOWED IN PART and 84 Habib's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. As discussed above, Comerica may file a supplemental brief as to its section 1101 claim by January 27, 2020. Habib may respond with his own supplemental brief by no later than 14 days (February 10, 2020) following Comerica's submission. A trial on damages shall commence on March 2, 2020. A separate order will issue establishing pre-trial deadlines. (Montes, Mariliz)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 14, 2020

Filing 118 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered.The Court ALLOWS Comerica's motion to Dismiss Count II of the Amended Complaint and CANCELS the trial currently scheduled for March 2, 2020. Comerica shall file any request for an award of attorneys' fees and costs within 21 days of the issuance of this Order. (Montes, Mariliz)

January 6, 2020

Filing 111 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. 77 Comerica's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is ALLOWED IN PART and 84 Habib's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. As discussed above, Comerica may file a supplemental brief as to its section 1101 claim by January 27, 2020. Habib may respond with his own supplemental brief by no later than 14 days (February 10, 2020) following Comerica's submission. A trial on damages shall commence on March 2, 2020. A separate order will issue establishing pre-trial deadlines. (Montes, Mariliz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: COMERICA BANK & TRUST, N.A. as Personal Representative of the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson v. HABIB
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: COMERICA BANK & TRUST, N.A.
Represented By:	Craig R. Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: KIAN ANDREW HABIB
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?