Lu v. Trustees of Tufts College
Friedrich Lu and United States of America |
Trustees of Tufts College and Marielena Gamboa Ruiz |
1:2018cv10105 |
January 19, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Boston Office |
Suffolk |
Indira Talwani |
Other Statutes: False Claims Act |
31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING Defendant Trustees of Tufts College's 26 Motion to Dismiss and Defendant Gamboa-Ruiz's 33 Motion to Dismiss in part and DENYING in part. Counts One, Two and Three of Pl aintiff's 1 Complaint are DISMISSED with prejudice as to Plaintiff Lu and without prejudice as to the United States. Counts Four through Seven of Plaintiff's 1 Complaint are DISMISSED without prejudice, Defendants' requests for attorney's fees and costs are DENIED. (Haran, Jodi) |
Filing 24 Judge Indira Talwani: For the reasons set forth in the attached Order: 1. Defendant Trustees of Tufts College's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs Complaint 23 is ALLOWED. Tufts shall file its response to Plaint iff's Complaint 1 by August 17, 2018. 2. Relator's Motion for Full Disclosure 22 is DENIED as frivolous. 3. If Plaintiff seeks to proceed against Defendant Gambia-Ruiz, he shall serve and file a proof of service by August 31, 2018, unless Gambia-Ruiz waives service by filing a response to the Complaint [#1]. (MacDonald, Gail) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.