Perrot v. Kelly et al
| George Perrot |
| Thomas Kelly, Thomas Jarvis, Richard Kane, Charles Arpin, John Scanlon, David Louden, Thomas Kennedy, Paul Lance, Chief Ernest Stelzer, Marianne Popko, Paul Glantz, Ronald St. Germain, Andrew Canevari, Cheryl Clapprood, Captain John Brown, Unknown Officers of the Springfield Police Department, City of Springfield, Massachusetts, Frances Bloom, William Eubanks, Wayne Oakes and Unknown Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation |
| 1:2018cv10147 |
| January 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Essex |
| Douglas P. Woodlock |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
345
Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the above reasons, plaintiff’s motion to compel Alissa Griffin’s mental health records 306 is allowed in part and denied in part, without prejudice; and the City’s motion to compel production of the Timeline 309 is allowed in part and denied in part.(Vieira, Leonardo)
|
|
Filing
202
Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE DENYING MOTIONS TO DISMISS...The motion to dismiss by Charles Arpin [Dkt No. 129] is DENIED; The motion to dismiss by defendants Estate of Thomas Kelly, Cheryl Clapprood, Paul Glantz, Thomas Jarvis, Thomas Kennedy, Marianne Popko, and Ronald St. Germain [Dkt. No. 137] is DENIED;The motion to dismiss by the City of Springfield [Dkt No. 140] is DENIED;The motion to dismiss by defendant Fr ances Bloom [Dkt. No. 142] is DENIED, except as to any claim concerning failure to intervene, regarding which it is GRANTED; and The motion to dismiss of the defendant Richard Kane [Dkt. No 146] is DENIED.And it is FURTHER ORDERED in light of the Report and Recommendation that claims against someone identified as Paul Lance be dismissed and that any claims asserted against the Springfield Police Department, as such, shall be assimilated to the proper municipal institutional entity, the City of Springfield. (Beatty, Barbara)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
