Daley v. Mira, Inc. et al
| Nancy Daley |
| Mira, Inc. and The Schepens Eye Research Institute |
| 1:2018cv10353 |
| February 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Barnstable |
| Leo T. Sorokin |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
187
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER ON DEFENDANT SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 165 ) Plaintiff's show cause response due by 11/13/2023. (Belmont, Kellyann)
|
|
Filing
167
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. ORDER ON DEFENDANT SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 152 ) AND PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 156 ) (Belmont, Kellyann)
|
|
Filing
62
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered.Defendant, The Schepens Eye Research Institute, Inc.'s 19 Motion to Dismiss is ALLOWED as to Counts IV, V, and VI insofar as they are directed at SERI, and is otherwise DENIED. Within thirty ( 30) days of this Order, the parties shall confer and submit a joint scheduling proposal to govern pretrial proceedings in this case, including a discovery plan as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), a briefing schedule for dispositive motions, and any other matters to be included in a scheduling order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(3). (Montes, Mariliz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
