United States of America et al v. Tuft Shared Services, Inc. et al
| 1:2018cv11260 |
| October 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)) |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. Karvelas shall either within fourteen days (1) submit a memorandum, not to exceed ten pages, explaining the basis for concluding that his Second Amended Complaint complies with Rule 8, or (2) replace the Second Amended Complaint with a revised pleading that complies with the strictures of Rule 8.Along with his Second Amended Complaint, Karvelas simultaneously filed a memorandum of law. Doc. No. 48. The Court STRIKES this document as it exceeds the standard 20-page limit for memoranda. See Local Rule 7.1(b)(4) (providing that [m]emoranda supporting or opposing allowance of motions shall not, without leave of court, exceed 20 pages, double-spaced.). The Court reminds Karvelas that all memor anda must not only comply with the page limits imposed by the Court but also the related formatting rules set forth in Local Rule 5.1. re 47 Amended Complaint filed by John Karvelas, 48 Memorandum of Law filed by John Karvelas, ( Karvelas' memorandum due by 1/30/2020)(Montes, Mariliz)
|
|
Filing
45
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. 31 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is ALLOWED. As the Court' s conclusion as to Counts I and II against Defendant TMC turns on plausibility, those claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Karvelas may, within 21 days of the issuance of this Order, amend his Complaint with respect to Counts I and II against Defendant TMC. (Montes, Mariliz)
|
|
Filing
35
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered.The Court has reviewed the memorandum as well as the moving papers (which conform to the page limits) and finds no basis to authorize a filing exceeding the limits imposed by the Local Rule. Accordingly , the Court STRIKES Karvelas' opposition and related filings (Doc. Nos. 33, 34).Karvelas may file a revised opposition in compliance with the Local Rules provided he does by November 1, 2019.A copy of this Order has been mailed to Mr. Karvelas. (Montes, Mariliz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America et al v. Tuft Shared Services, Inc. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
