Diaz v. Miraca Life Sciences, Inc. et al
Manuel Diaz |
Sven Holder, Tena Lyght and Miraca Life Sciences, Inc. |
1:2018cv11355 |
June 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Boston Office |
Middlesex |
Patti B Saris |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by mail. (Pacho, Arnold) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief Judge Patti B. Saris assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (McKillop, Matthew) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Asha A. Santos on behalf of Sven Holder, Miraca Life Sciences, Inc. (Santos, Asha) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Miraca Life Sciences, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Inform Diagnostics, Inc., Corporate Parent CDx Holdings, Inc. for Miraca Life Sciences, Inc... (Bingham, Francis) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Sven Holder, Miraca Life Sciences, Inc. ( Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7207367 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B - Notice to State Court, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Category Form)(Bingham, Francis) (Attachment 4 replaced on 6/28/2018) (Pacho, Arnold). Modified on 6/28/2018 to flatten PDF (Pacho, Arnold). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.