Marradi v. PIM TRS Boston Back Bay LLC
Raoul Marradi |
PIM TRS Boston Back Bay LLC |
1:2018cv11466 |
July 13, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Boston Office |
Suffolk |
Leo T Sorokin |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1218 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint PIM TRS Boston Back Bay LLC answer. (Simeone, Maria) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint Or Otherwise Respond by PIM TRS Boston Back Bay LLC.(Pinarchick, Cheryl) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Cheryl B. Pinarchick on behalf of PIM TRS Boston Back Bay LLC (Pinarchick, Cheryl) |
Filing 6 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Todd W. Shulby. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register for electronic filing if the attorney does not already have an ECF account in this district. To register go to the Court website at www.mad.uscourts.gov. Select Case Information, then Electronic Filing (CM/ECF) and go to the CM/ECF Registration Form. (Montes, Mariliz) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Todd W. Shulby, Esq. Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number 0101-7264797 by Raoul Marradi. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Florida Bar Letter of Good Standing)(Garno, Edward) |
Filing 4 Set Deadlines: Complete Service by 10/15/2018. (Montes, Mariliz) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to PIM TRS Boston Back Bay LLC. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Vieira, Leonardo) |
Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (McKillop, Matthew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PIM TRS Boston Back Bay LLC Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7229802 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Raoul Marradi. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Garno, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Marradi v. PIM TRS Boston Back Bay LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Raoul Marradi | |
Represented By: | Edward N. Garno |
Represented By: | Todd W. Shulby |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: PIM TRS Boston Back Bay LLC | |
Represented By: | Cheryl B. Pinarchick |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.