Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Company v. Arch Specialty Insurance Company
Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Company |
Arch Specialty Insurance Company |
1:2018cv11597 |
July 30, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Boston Office |
Suffolk |
Leo T Sorokin |
Richard G Stearns |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 MEMORANDUM in Support re #24 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction filed by Arch Specialty Insurance Company. (Rodgers, Matthew) |
Filing 24 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction by Arch Specialty Insurance Company.(Rodgers, Matthew) |
Filing 23 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Arch Specialty Insurance Company. (Rodgers, Matthew) |
Filing 22 Letter from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts - Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation. (Pacho, Arnold) |
Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew D. Rodgers on behalf of Arch Specialty Insurance Company (Rodgers, Matthew) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Christian B.W. Stephens on behalf of Arch Specialty Insurance Company (Stephens, Christian) |
Filing 19 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #18 Motion to Vacate #15 Notice: Clerk's Entry of Default. Per the parties' agreement, Arch's answer to the complaint shall be filed by September 27, 2018, and an opposition to the motion for summary judgment by October 18, 2018. (Pacho, Arnold) |
Filing 18 MOTION to Vacate #15 Notice: Clerk's Entry of Default by Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Company.(Rajbanshi, Scarlett) |
Filing 17 Copy re #15 Notice: Clerk's Entry of Default mailed to Arch Specialty Insurance Company on 9/5/2018 to address provided on proof of service. Certified mail receipt # (7002 0510 0004 1358 7357). (Pacho, Arnold) |
Filing 16 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered. STANDING ORDER on motions for default judgment re #15 Notice: Clerk's Entry of Default. (Pacho, Arnold) |
Filing 15 NOTICE: Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Arch Specialty Insurance Company. (Pacho, Arnold) |
Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT in Support re #13 Request for notice of default Against Defendant Arch Specialty Insurance Company. (Rajbanshi, Scarlett) |
Filing 13 Request for notice of default by Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Company Against Defendant Arch Specialty Insurance Company. (Rajbanshi, Scarlett) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Lincoln A. Rose on behalf of Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Company (Rose, Lincoln) |
Filing 11 ELECTRONIC NOTICE issued requesting courtesy copies for #5 MOTION for Summary Judgment , #6 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #7 Statement of Material Facts L.R. 56.1. Counsel who filed these documents are requested to submit courtesy copies to the Clerk's Office. These documents must be clearly marked as a Courtesy Copy and reflect the document number assigned by CM/ECF. (Pacho, Arnold) |
Filing 10 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Reassignment. Judge Richard G. Stearns added. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin no longer assigned to case. (Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 9 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. ORDER OF RECUSAL. I hereby RECUSE from this case under 28 U.S.C. section 455. The clerk shall randomly reassign this case to another district judge. (Montes, Mariliz) |
Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent United States Liability Insurance Company, Corporate Parent Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., Corporate Parent U.S. Investment Corporation for Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Company.. (Rajbanshi, Scarlett) |
Filing 7 Statement of Material Facts L.R. 56.1 re #5 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q, #18 Exhibit R, #19 Exhibit S, #20 Exhibit T)(Rajbanshi, Scarlett) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM in Support re #5 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Company. (Rajbanshi, Scarlett) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Company.(Rajbanshi, Scarlett) |
Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE Executed by Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Company. Arch Specialty Insurance Company served on 8/2/2018, answer due 8/23/2018. Acknowledgement filed by Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Company. (Rajbanshi, Scarlett) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Arch Specialty Insurance Company. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Pacho, Arnold) |
Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler. (Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Arch Specialty Insurance Company Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7251867 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Sheet, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E)(Rajbanshi, Scarlett) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.