Williams v. Cowen
Anthony Williams |
Brad Cowen |
1:2018cv11620 |
August 1, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Boston Office |
Norfolk |
Jennifer C Boal |
Patti B Saris |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Letter/request (non-motion) from Todd M. Blume . (Blume, Todd) |
Filing 12 Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered " Allowed " re #10 MOTION for Extension of Time to November 13, 2018 to File Answer or Responsive Pleading Answer Due 11/13/2018 (Coppola, Katelyn) |
Filing 11 Refusal to Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge. . (Blume, Todd) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to November 13, 2018 to File Answer or Responsive Pleading by Brad Cowen.(Blume, Todd) Modified on 9/18/2018 to correct event type (Coppola, Katelyn). |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Todd M. Blume on behalf of Brad Cowen (Blume, Todd) |
Filing 8 Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal Referred for: Full Pretrial Case Management and RR all Dispositive Motions (ptd). (Coppola, Katelyn) |
Filing 7 Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered. SERVICE ORDER re 2254 Petition. Order entered pursuant to R.4 of the Rules governing Section 2254 cases for service on respondents. Answer/responsive pleading due w/in 21 days of receipt of this order. (Coppola, Katelyn) |
Filing 6 Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis insofar as Williams seeks to establish financial eligibility for appointment of counsel under the Criminal Justice Act; denying without prejudice #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. [Copy of Order mailed to petitioner on 8/15/2018.] (PSSA, 3) |
Filing 5 Filing fee/payment: $ 5.00, receipt number 1BST069675 for #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) (Vieira, Leonardo) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief Judge Patti B. Saris assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Coppola, Katelyn) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Anthony Williams.(Castilla, Francis) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Anthony Williams. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Inmate Statement)(Castilla, Francis) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28:2254, filed by Anthony Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Castilla, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Williams v. Cowen | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Brad Cowen | |
Represented By: | Todd M. Blume |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Anthony Williams | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.