Inline Plastics Corp. v. Lacerta Group, Inc.
| Inline Plastics Corp. |
| Lacerta Group, Inc. |
| 4:2018cv11631 |
| August 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Timothy S Hillman |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas F. Foley on behalf of Inline Plastics Corp. (Foley, Thomas) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Lacerta Group, Inc.. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Jones, Sherry) |
| Filing 8 District Judge Timothy S. Hillman: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added David J. Silvia. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register for electronic filing if the attorney does not already have an ECF account in this district. To register go to the Court website at www.mad.uscourts.gov. Select Case Information, then Electronic Filing (CM/ECF) and go to the CM/ECF Registration Form. (Jones, Sherry) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Timothy S. Hillman assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Chief Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy. (Alba, Robert) |
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from Eastern Division (Boston) on 8/3/2018 Case Number 1:18-cv-11631. (Alba, Robert) |
| Filing 5 Case transferred to Central Division (Worcester). (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING/TERMINATION OF AN ACTION REGARDING PATENT OR TRADEMARK. (Belt, Erik) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of David J. Silvia Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number 0101-7258610 by Inline Plastics Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Belt, Erik) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Inline Plastics Corp.. (Belt, Erik) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against Lacerta Group, Inc. Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7258568 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Inline Plastics Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Civil Category Sheet)(Belt, Erik) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Inline Plastics Corp. v. Lacerta Group, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lacerta Group, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Inline Plastics Corp. | |
| Represented By: | Erik Paul Belt |
| Represented By: | David J. Silvia |
| Represented By: | Thomas F. Foley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
