Balor Audio LLC v. Avid Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Balor Audio LLC
Defendant: Avid Technology, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2018cv11662
Filed: August 7, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Suffolk
Presiding Judge: Denise J Casper
Referring Judge: Judith G Dein
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2018 Filing 23 ANSWER to Counterclaim by Balor Audio LLC.(Chico-Barris, Gustavo)
September 24, 2018 Filing 22 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven R. Katz on behalf of Avid Technology, Inc. (Katz, Steven)
September 20, 2018 Filing 21 Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered. Standing Order Re: Courtroom Opportunities for Relatively Inexperienced Attorneys(Hourihan, Lisa)
September 20, 2018 Filing 20 NOTICE of Scheduling Conference Scheduling Conference set for 10/22/2018 02:15 PM in Courtroom 11 before Judge Denise J. Casper. (Hourihan, Lisa)
September 19, 2018 Filing 19 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Re-Assignment. Judge Denise J. Casper assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Finn, Mary)
September 19, 2018 Filing 18 ELECTRONIC NOTICE CANCELLING HEARING. In light of the parties' filing of a completed notification form, the Status Conference scheduled for 9/24/18 is cancelled. A 16(b) Conference will be scheduled when appropriate. (Dambrosio, Jolyne)
September 18, 2018 Filing 17 Refusal to Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge. . (Chico-Barris, Gustavo)
September 17, 2018 Filing 16 SECOND ELECTRONIC REMINDER TO COUNSEL & NOTICE OF STATUS CONFERENCE: A notification form indicating whether or not the parties have consented to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge has not been filed. Submission of the form is mandatory and a completed form should be filed promptly. Additional forms can be obtained on the Court's web page at http://www.mad.uscourts.gov. A Status Conference has been set for 9/24/18 3:00PM in Courtroom 15 before Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein to address this issue. Should counsel file the form prior to the hearing date, the Conference will be cancelled.(Dambrosio, Jolyne)
September 11, 2018 Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Anshul M. Mehra on behalf of Avid Technology, Inc. (Mehra, Anshul)
September 11, 2018 Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against All Plaintiffs by Avid Technology, Inc..(Gaff, Brian)
August 31, 2018 Filing 13 Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #2 & #3 Motions for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Eugenio J. Torres-Oyola and Jean G. Vidal-Font added. (Dambrosio, Jolyne)
August 31, 2018 Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Avid Technology, Inc.. (Gaff, Brian)
August 31, 2018 Filing 11 ELECTRONIC REMINDER TO COUNSEL: A notification form indicating whether or not the parties have consented to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge has not been filed. Submission of the form is mandatory and a completed form should be filed promptly. Additional forms can be obtained on the Court's web page at http://www.mad.uscourts.gov. (Dambrosio, Jolyne)
August 31, 2018 Filing 10 Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #9 Assented to Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Avid Technology, Inc. answer due 10/5/2018. (Dambrosio, Jolyne)
August 30, 2018 Filing 9 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to October 5, 2018 to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, by Avid Technology, Inc..(Gaff, Brian)
August 30, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian M. Gaff on behalf of Avid Technology, Inc. (Gaff, Brian)
August 24, 2018 Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE Executed by Balor Audio LLC. Avid Technology, Inc. served on 8/15/2018, answer due 9/5/2018. Acknowledgement filed by Balor Audio LLC. (Chico-Barris, Gustavo)
August 7, 2018 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Avid Technology, Inc.. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Vieira, Leonardo)
August 7, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (DaSilva, Carolina)
August 7, 2018 Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING/TERMINATION OF AN ACTION REGARDING PATENT OR TRADEMARK. (Chico-Barris, Gustavo) (Main Document 4 replaced on 8/9/2018) (Burgos, Sandra).
August 7, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Jean G. Vidal-Font Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number 0101-7264188 by Balor Audio LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing Jean G. Vidal-Font, #2 Exhibit B - Affidavit of Jean G. Vidal-Font)(Chico-Barris, Gustavo)
August 7, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Eugenio J. Torres-Oyola Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number 0101-7264171 by Balor Audio LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing Eugenio J. Torres-Oyola, #2 Exhibit B - Affidavit of Eugenio J. Torres-Oyola)(Chico-Barris, Gustavo)
August 7, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Avid Technology, Inc. Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7264056 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Balor Audio LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - US Patent No. 8649891, #2 Category Sheet, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons as to Avid Technology, Inc.)(Chico-Barris, Gustavo) (Attachment 2 replaced on 8/7/2018) (Vieira, Leonardo). (Attachment 3 replaced on 8/7/2018) (Vieira, Leonardo). (Attachment 4 replaced on 8/7/2018) (Vieira, Leonardo). (Attachment 3 replaced on 8/7/2018) (Vieira, Leonardo).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Balor Audio LLC v. Avid Technology, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Avid Technology, Inc.
Represented By: Anshul M. Mehra
Represented By: Brian M. Gaff
Represented By: Steven R. Katz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Balor Audio LLC
Represented By: Gustavo A. Chico-Barris
Represented By: Eugenio J. Torres-Oyola
Represented By: Jean G Vidal-Font
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?