DeAmicis v. United States of America
Susan E. DeAmicis |
United States of America |
1:2018cv11803 |
August 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Denise J Casper |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to United States of America. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (McKillop, Matthew) |
Filing 7 USMS SERVICE NOTICE (PSSA, 5) |
Filing 6 Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis 1.Plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (collectively, ECF Nos. 2 and 1-2, pp.18-19) is ALLOWED. 2.The Clerk shall issue a summons for service of the complaint on defendant. The Clerk shall send the summons, complaint, and this Order to the plaintiff, who must thereafter serve the defendant in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Plaintiff may elect to have service made by the United States Marshals Service. If directed by the plaintiff to do so, the United States Marshals Service shall serve the summons, complaint, and this Order upon the defendant, in the manner directed by the plaintiff, with all costs of service to be advanced by the United States. Notwithstanding this Order to the United States Marshal Service, it remains plaintiffs responsibility to provide the United States Marshal Service with all necessary paperwork and service information. Notwithstanding Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) and Local Rule 4.1, the plaintiff shall have 90 days from the date of this Order to complete service. (PSSA, 5) |
Filing 5 Copy re #3 General Order 09-1 mailed to Susan E. DeAmicis on 8/28/2018., DOCKET SHEET sent (Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Denise J. Casper assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 3 General Order 09-1, dated January 6, 2009 regarding the E-Government Act and Personal Identifiers entered. (Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Susan E. DeAmicis.(Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States of America, filed by Susan E. DeAmicis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet and Cover Form, #2 Exhibits)(Danieli, Chris) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: DeAmicis v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Susan E. DeAmicis | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States of America | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.