Marradi v. King and I Corporation et al
Raoul Marradi |
King and I Corporation and Linear Retail Boston #14 LLC |
1:2018cv11832 |
August 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
M Page Kelley |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #9 Assented-To Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants shall respond to the complaint on or before the close of business on October 31, 2018. (MacDougall, Patricia) |
Filing 9 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to October 31, 2018 to Respond to Complaint by King and I Corporation, Linear Retail Boston #14 LLC.(O'Connell, Liam) |
Filing 8 Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer King and I Corporation answer due 10/23/2018; Linear Retail Boston #14 LLC answer due 10/23/2018. (Belmont, Kellyann) |
Filing 7 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to October 23, 2018 to Respond to Complaint by King and I Corporation, Linear Retail Boston #14 LLC.(O'Connell, Liam) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Liam T. O'Connell on behalf of King and I Corporation, Linear Retail Boston #14 LLC (O'Connell, Liam) |
Filing 5 Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Todd W. Shulby. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register for electronic filing if the attorney does not already have an ECF account in this district. To register go to the Court website at www.mad.uscourts.gov. Select Case Information, then Electronic Filing (CM/ECF) and go to the CM/ECF Registration Form. (Belmont, Kellyann) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Todd W. Shulby, Esq. Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number 0101-7320268 by Raoul Marradi. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Florida Bar Letter of Good Standing)(Garno, Edward) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to King and I Corporation, Linear Retail Boston #14 LLC. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Linear Retail Boston #14 LLC, King and I Corporation Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7292866 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Raoul Marradi. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Garno, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.