Shannon v. Dougherty
| Steven Shannon |
| Joseph Dougherty |
| 1:2018cv11837 |
| August 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Leo T Sorokin |
| Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF RESCHEDULING; The Scheduling Conference set for 11/5/18 has been reset for 11/13/2018 10:30 AM in Courtroom 13 before District Judge Leo T. Sorokin. (Simeone, Maria) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by David S. Smith on behalf of Joseph Dougherty (Smith, David) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Scheduling Conference; A Scheduling Conference has been set for 11/5/2018 02:30 PM in Courtroom 13 before District Judge Leo T. Sorokin. (Simeone, Maria) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/10/2018: #1 scheduling order, #2 standing order on summary judgment) (Simeone, Maria). |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Joseph Dougherty.(Kantor, Julie) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Julie L. Kantor on behalf of Joseph Dougherty (Kantor, Julie) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATION pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 . (Keane, Brian) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE Executed by Steven Shannon. Joseph Dougherty served on 9/14/2018, answer due 10/5/2018. Acknowledgement filed by Steven Shannon. (Keane, Brian) |
| Filing 4 Set Deadlines: Service to be completed by 11/26/2018. (Montes, Mariliz) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Joseph Dougherty. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Manolakis, Ashley) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (DaSilva, Carolina) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joseph Dougherty Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7293826 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Steven Shannon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Keane, Brian) Modified on 8/28/2018 to edit party name and Attachment 2 replaced on 8/28/2018 in order to flatten to PDF) (Manolakis, Ashley). Modified on 8/28/2018 (Manolakis, Ashley). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shannon v. Dougherty | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steven Shannon | |
| Represented By: | Brian Keane |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Joseph Dougherty | |
| Represented By: | David S. Smith |
| Represented By: | Julie L. Kantor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
