American Waterways Operators v. United States Coast Guard
| American Waterways Operators |
| United States Coast Guard |
| 1:2018cv12070 |
| October 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Denise J Casper |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Judge Denise J. Casper: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added C. Jonathan Benner and Kathleen E. Kraft. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register for electronic filing if the attorney does not already have an ECF account in this district. To register go to the Court website at www.mad.uscourts.gov. Select Case Information, then Electronic Filing (CM/ECF) and go to the CM/ECF Registration Form. (McKillop, Matthew) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to United States Coast Guard. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Vieira, Leonardo) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Denise J. Casper assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Ronaldo Rauseo-Ricupero on behalf of American Waterways Operators (Rauseo-Ricupero, Ronaldo) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of C. Jonathan Benner and Kathleen E. Kraft Filing fee: $ 200, receipt number 0101-7351639 by American Waterways Operators. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certification of C. Jonathan Benner, #2 Exhibit B - Certification of Kathleen E. Kraft)(Skelly, George) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by American Waterways Operators. (Skelly, George) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States Coast Guard Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7351518 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by American Waterways Operators. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Skelly, George) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: American Waterways Operators v. United States Coast Guard | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Coast Guard | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: American Waterways Operators | |
| Represented By: | Ronaldo Rauseo-Ricupero |
| Represented By: | George J. Skelly |
| Represented By: | C. Jonathan Benner |
| Represented By: | Kathleen E. Kraft |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
