Auctus Fund, LLC v. Arias Intel Corp.
| Auctus Fund, LLC |
| Arias Intel Corp. |
| 1:2018cv12153 |
| October 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Leo T Sorokin |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE Executed by Auctus Fund, LLC. Arias Intel Corp. served on 10/30/2018, answer due 11/20/2018. Acknowledgement filed by Auctus Fund, LLC. (Giordano, Philip) |
| Filing 17 Notice of Service of Process filed by Auctus Fund, LLC. Individual(s)/Entities served: Arias Intel Corp.. (Giordano, Philip) |
| Filing 16 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER and PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION entered. (Simeone, Maria) |
| Filing 15 Electronic Clerk's Notes for proceedings held before District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: Motion Hearing held on 10/26/2018; Defense counsel does not appear. The court goes over the service. Plaintiff represents to the court that the complaint, all motion papers and the 7 order setting this case for hearing was sent fed ex to the defendants. The court is satisfied notice has been received of the complaint, motion papers and the order for this hearing and allows the #3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; re #2 Emergency MOTION to Expedite on a Short Order of Notice, with Certificate of Service filed by Auctus Fund, LLC, #3 Emergency MOTION for Preliminary Injunction on a Short Order of Notice, with Certificate of Service filed by Auctus Fund, LLC. (Court Reporter: Linda Walsh at lwalshsteno@gmail.com.) (Simeone, Maria) |
| Filing 14 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Plaintiff shall file within seven days proof that, prior to the hearing today, it served a copy of the Court's electronic order scheduling the hearing on the defendant as represented by counsel.(Plaintiff's proof of service due by 11/1/2018)(Montes, Mariliz) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER by Auctus Fund, LLC re 7 Order,,,,, Set Deadlines,,,,, Set Hearings,,,,, Set Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings,,,, 12 Order on Motion for Leave to File, with Certificate of Service. (Giordano, Philip) |
| Filing 12 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #10 Motion for Leave to File Document ; Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order)- in the caption of the document. (Simeone, Maria) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER by Auctus Fund, LLC re 7 Order,,,,, Set Deadlines,,,,, Set Hearings,,,,, Set Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings,,,, with Certificate of Service. (Giordano, Philip) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to File Late Its Statement in Response to October 16th Order, with Certificate of Service by Auctus Fund, LLC.(Giordano, Philip) |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE Executed by Auctus Fund, LLC. Acknowledgement filed by Auctus Fund, LLC. (Giordano, Philip) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed Arias Intel Corp. served on 10/17/2018, answer due 11/7/2018. (Giordano, Philip) |
| Filing 7 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. The Plaintiff shall serve the complaint and all the related motion papers it has filed with the Court forthwith. The Court will hold a hearing on the Emergency Motion for Preliminary Injunction on Friday October 26, 2018 at 2:00 p.m., provided Plaintiff has completed service as required by the applicable rules and this Order by Friday October 19, 2018. Plaintiff shall file a proof of service on Monday October 22, 2018. Any response to the Motion for Preliminary relief shall be filed by Wednesday October 24, 2018. Plaintiff by October 22, 2018, in a filing not to exceed five pages, and defendant in its response shall also address whether the Court ought consolidate the pending motion with summary judgment or trial on the merits and, if so, the schedule to govern such a consolidated proceeding. The Emergency Motion to Expedite (#2) is ALLOWED to the extent described herein and otherwise denied. (Response due by 10/24/2018. Motion Hearing set for 10/26/2018 02:00 PM in Courtroom 13 before District Judge Leo T. Sorokin.)(Simeone, Maria) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Arias Intel Corp.. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Danieli, Chris) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Danieli, Chris) |
| Filing 4 Emergency MEMORANDUM in Support re #2 Emergency MOTION to Expedite on a Short Order of Notice, with Certificate of Service, #3 Emergency MOTION for Preliminary Injunction on a Short Order of Notice, with Certificate of Service on a Short Order of Notice, with Certificate of Service filed by Auctus Fund, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Giordano, Philip) |
| Filing 3 Emergency MOTION for Preliminary Injunction on a Short Order of Notice, with Certificate of Service by Auctus Fund, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Louis Posner, #2 Affidavit of Philip M. Giordano, #3 Exhibit I, #4 Exhibit I [A], #5 Exhibit I [B], #6 Exhibit I [C], #7 Exhibit I [D] #1 + [D] #2 , #8 Exhibit I [D] #3 , #9 Exhibit I [D] #4 , #10 Exhibit i [E], #11 Exhibit II, #12 Exhibit III, #13 Exhibit IV, #14 Exhibit V, #15 Exhibit VI, #16 Exhibit VII, #17 Exhibit VIII, #18 Exhibit IX, #19 Text of Proposed Order for Preliminary Injunction & Specific Performance to Compel Conversions of Debt Into Public Shares)(Giordano, Philip) |
| Filing 2 Emergency MOTION to Expedite on a Short Order of Notice, with Certificate of Service by Auctus Fund, LLC.(Giordano, Philip) Modified on 10/16/2018 (Simeone, Maria). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Demand for Jury Trial against All Defendants Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7366199 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Auctus Fund, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit I, #2 Exhibit I [A], #3 Exhibit I [B], #4 Exhibit I [C], #5 Exhibit I [D] #1 + [D] #2 , #6 Exhibit I [D] #3 , #7 Exhibit I [D] #4 , #8 Exhibit I [E], #9 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Action Cover Sheet, #10 JS45 Category Sheet)(Giordano, Philip) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Auctus Fund, LLC v. Arias Intel Corp. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Auctus Fund, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Philip M. Giordano |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Arias Intel Corp. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
