Acosta v. P&B Partitions, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant: Ronald Biglin, Jr. and P&B Partitions, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2018cv12398
Filed: November 16, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Patti B Saris
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29:201
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 14, 2019 Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by R. Alexander Acosta. Ronald Biglin, Jr. waiver sent on 1/9/2018, answer due 3/10/2018. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Salzberg, Susan) (Main Document 8 replaced on 1/14/2019 to flatten PDF) (Caruso, Stephanie).
January 14, 2019 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by R. Alexander Acosta. P&B Partitions, Inc. waiver sent on 1/9/2019, answer due 3/11/2019. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Salzberg, Susan) (Main Document 7 replaced on 1/14/2019 to flatten PDF) (Caruso, Stephanie).
January 14, 2019 Filing 6 Joint MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment and Proposed Order by R. Alexander Acosta. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service)(Salzberg, Susan)
November 16, 2018 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Ronald Biglin, Jr., P&B Partitions, Inc.. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (DaSilva, Carolina)
November 16, 2018 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief Judge Patti B. Saris assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (Danieli, Chris)
November 16, 2018 Filing 3 STIPULATION re #2 Exhibit, #1 Complaint by R. Alexander Acosta. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Certificate of Service)(Salzberg, Susan)
November 16, 2018 Filing 2 EXHIBIT A re: #1 Complaint by R. Alexander Acosta. (Salzberg, Susan)
November 16, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Fee Status: US Government), filed by R. Alexander Acosta. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Salzberg, Susan) (Attachment 1& 2 replaced on 11/16/2018 due to fillable format) (DaSilva, Carolina).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Acosta v. P&B Partitions, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: R. Alexander Acosta
Represented By: Susan Goldstein Salzberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ronald Biglin, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: P&B Partitions, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?