Hull Leavitt v. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
Case Number: 1:2018cv12433
Filed: May 8, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 0078 j

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 70 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: In accordance with the foregoing, the defendants' motion to dismiss (Docket No. 59 ) is ALLOWED and the Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice.So ordered. (Vieira, Leonardo)
May 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 40 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, 1) the motion to appoint Tunc Toker as lead plaintiff and to approve his selection of lead counsel and liaison counsel (Docket No. 17) is ALLOWED;< p>2) the motion to appoint Caryl Hull Leavitt as lead plaintiff and to approve her selection of lead counsel and liaison counsel (Docket No. 20) is DENIED;3) the motion to appoint Frederick Edwards as lead plaintiff and to approve his selec tion of lead counsel (Docket No. 23) is DENIED; and4) the motion to appoint Charles Iappini as lead plaintiff and to approve his selection of lead counsel (Docket No. 24) is DENIED.So ordered. (Vieira, Leonardo) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/8/2019: # 1 Signed Order) (Vieira, Leonardo).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hull Leavitt v. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?