Liviz v. Supreme Court of the United States of America et al
Ilya Liviz |
Neil M. Gorsuch, Brett M. Kavanaugh, John G. Roberts, Sonia Sotomayer, Elena Kagan, Samuel A. Alito, Jr., SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Stephen G. Breyer, Clarence Thomas and Ruth Bader Ginsburg |
1:2018cv12532 |
December 10, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Allison D Burroughs |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 USCA Case Number 18-2252 for #11 Notice of Appeal filed by Ilya Liviz. (Paine, Matthew) |
Filing 13 Certified and Transmitted Abbreviated Electronic Record on Appeal to US Court of Appeals re #11 Notice of Appeal. (Paine, Matthew) |
Filing 12 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered denying #10 Motion for Clarification with request to appeal to Appeal In Forma Pauperis. Under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), "An appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith." The applicant's good faith is established by the presentation of any issue that is not plainly frivolous. Ellis v. United States, 356 U.S. 674, 674 (1958). A complaint is frivolous if it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). Such is the case here, where the complaint was dismissed without leave to amend and this court certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. [ECF No. 5]. This ruling does not preclude Liviz from obtaining permission to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis directly from the First Circuit Court of Appeals, provided he does so pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5).(PSSA, 4) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #6 Order Dismissing Case by Ilya Liviz Fee Status: IFP requested. NOTICE TO COUNSEL: A Transcript Report/Order Form, which can be downloaded from the First Circuit Court of Appeals web site at #http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov MUST be completed and submitted to the Court of Appeals. Counsel shall register for a First Circuit CM/ECF Appellate Filer Account at #http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/cmecf. Counsel shall also review the First Circuit requirements for electronic filing by visiting the CM/ECF Information section at #http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/cmecf. US District Court Clerk to deliver official record to Court of Appeals by 1/7/2019. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit and Motion to Proceed with Appeal in Forma Pauperis)(Liviz, Ilya) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Clarification re #5 Order on Motion for Injuctive Relief, Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with Request to Appeal in Forma Pauperis by Ilya Liviz.(Liviz, Ilya) |
Filing 9 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. ECF No. #7 , Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, is DENIED. On December 14, 2018, the Court granted Plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, denied his request for injunctive relief, and dismissed this case. [ECF No. #6 ]. Plaintiff then moved for reconsideration. [M]otions for reconsideration are appropriate only in a limited number of circumstances: if the moving party presents newly discovered evidence, if there has been an intervening change in the law, or if the movant can demonstrate that the original decision was based on a manifest error of law or was clearly unjust. United States v. Allen, 573 F.3d 42, 53 (1st Cir. 2009). District court have substantial discretion and broad authority to grant or deny motions for reconsideration and will generally grant such motions where they have patently misunderstood a party... or [have] made an error not of reasoning but apprehension. Ruiz Rivera v. Pfizer Pharm., LLC, 521 F.3d 76, 81 (1st Cir. 2008). Plaintiff's argument that the Court's order was erroneous does not demonstrate a manifest error of law. The motion is denied. (McDonagh, Christina) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support re #7 MOTION for Reconsideration re #5 Order on Motion for Injuctive Relief, Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #6 Order Dismissing Case with Request to Take a Chance On Me with Accompanying Exhibit Appendix filed by Ilya Liviz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A Appendix with 451 pages)(Liviz, Ilya) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Reconsideration re #5 Order on Motion for Injuctive Relief, Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #6 Order Dismissing Case with Request to Take a Chance On Me by Ilya Liviz.(Liviz, Ilya) |
Filing 6 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered. ORDER DISMISSING CASE(PSSA, 3) |
Filing 5 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered denying #4 Motion for Injunctive Relief; granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, dismissing the complaint and certifying that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. (PSSA, 3) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Injunctive Relief by Ilya Liviz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A Sunshine Act)(Liviz, Ilya) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Allison D. Burroughs assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ilya Liviz.(Liviz, Ilya) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH DEMAND TO INSTALL VIDEO COURT RECORDINGS IN SCOTUS & other courts against SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Fee Status: IFP requested), filed by ilya Liviz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form, #3 Exhibit Ex. A transcript)(Liviz, Ilya). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.