Snyder v. Rosenthal et al
Joanna M. Snyder |
Mark Henrk and Jill Rosenthal |
1:2018cv12590 |
December 7, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Nathaniel M Gorton |
Civil Rights: Other |
02 U.S.C. ยง 437 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint, MOTION for Extension of Time file an Amended Complaint ( Responses due by 2/15/2019) by Joanna M. Snyder.(McDonagh, Christina) |
Filing 4 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. ORDER DISMISSING CASE. [Copy of Order mailed to plaintiff on 12/31/2018.](PSSA, 3) |
Filing 3 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. No filing fee shall be assessed. [Copy or Order mailed to plaintiff on 12/31/2018.](PSSA, 3) |
Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mark Henrk, Jill Rosenthal, filed by Joanna M. Snyder. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Affidavit, #3 Exhibit, #4 prisoner account statement - restricted)(adminn, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.