Paisley Park Enterprises, Inc. et al v. George Ian Boxill et al
| Paisley Park Enterprises, Inc. and Comerica Bank & Trust, N.A. |
| George Ian Boxill, Rogue Music Alliance, LLC and Deliverance, LLC |
| Christopher Brown |
| 1:2018mc91058 |
| February 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Barnstable |
| Nathaniel M. Gorton |
| Other |
| No cause code entered |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered. After consideration of the memoranda filed by plaintiffs, defendants and Attorney Brown and the oral arguments of plaintiffs' counsel, Attorney Friedmann, and Attorney Brown on February 22, 20 18. 1) plaintiffs' motion to compel Attorney Brown to appear for his deposition (Docket No. 1) is ALLOWED; the deposition will be conducted in the district of Massachusetts on or before Friday, March 9, 2018.2) plaintiffs' motion to hold Attorney Brown in contempt and to award plaintiff attorneys' fees (Docket No. 1) is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending the completion of the subject deposition, and3) Attorney Brown's cross motion to quash the subpoena (Docket No. 10) is DENIED. So ordered. re 1 MOTION for Contempt PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER HOLDING CHRISTOPHER BROWN IN CONTEMPT FOR FAILURE TO RESPOND TO A SUBPOENA filed by Paisley Park Enterprises, Inc., Comerica Bank & Trust, N.A., 10 MOTION to Quash filed by Christopher Brown (Franklin, Yvonne)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
