Warner v. United States of America et al
| Luke Jospeh Warner |
| Designation Sentence Computation Center, Federal Bureau of Prisions, Office of Medical Designation Team, Richard M. Winter, Jason A Sickler and United States of America |
| 1:2019cv10076 |
| January 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Timothy S Hillman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Timothy S. Hillman assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson. (Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 3
General Order 09-1, dated January 6, 2009 regarding the E-Government Act and Personal Identifiers entered. (Castilla, Francis)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Luke Jospeh Warner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Index, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 10, #12 Exhibit 11, #13 Exhibit 12, #14 Exhibit 13, #15 Exhibit 14)(Castilla, Francis) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/14/2019: #16 Appendix 2, #17 Appendix # 3 ) (Castilla, Francis). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
