Menjivar Ortega v. Moniz et al
Oscar H Menjivar Ortega |
Superintendent Antone Moniz and Sheriff Joseph D. McDonald, Jr. |
1:2019cv10191 |
January 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Denise J Casper |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 STATUS REPORT by the Government by Antone Moniz. (Balakrishna, Annapurna) |
Filing 12 ELECTRONIC NOTICE Setting Hearing on Motion #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM : Motion Hearing set for 4/3/2019 02:30 PM in Courtroom 11 before Judge Denise J. Casper. (Hourihan, Lisa) |
Filing 11 Opposition re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Oscar H Menjivar Ortega. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit BIA remand, #2 Exhibit IJ Decision)(Rado, Rachel) |
Filing 10 Judge Denise J. Casper: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Responses due by 3/7/2019 (Hourihan, Lisa) |
Filing 9 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to 03/07/2019 to File Response/Reply Opposition by Oscar H Menjivar Ortega.(Rado, Rachel) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Antone Moniz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit ICE Declaration)(Balakrishna, Annapurna) |
Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Antone Moniz.(Balakrishna, Annapurna) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Annapurna Balakrishna on behalf of Antone Moniz (Balakrishna, Annapurna) |
Filing 5 Remark. On 1/31/2019, service of the Petition and Service Order effected in the following manner: (1) electronic copy emailed to US Attorney's Office (Souris, Farquhar, Prada); (2) hard copy mailed to Respondent Moniz; and (3) hard copy left in Clerk's office for pick-up by US Attorney's office, per usual business practice. (PSSA, 3) |
Filing 4 Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered. SERVICE ORDER re 2241 Petition. Superintendent Moniz shall be the sole respondent. The Clerk of this Court shall serve a copy of the Petition upon (i) PCCF Superintendent Antone Moniz; and (ii) the United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts. Respondent shall, no later than Wednesday, February 20, 2019, answer or respond to the Petition. To give the Court time to consider the matter, unless otherwise ordered by the Court, Petitioner shall not be moved outside the District of Massachusetts without providing the Court 48 hours advance notice of the move and the reason therefor. (PSSA, 3) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Denise J. Casper assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 2 Online access to documents in this case is limited to counsel of record only. All documents are available for review in the Office of the Clerk. Counsel of record: please note that you will need to log into CM/ECF to access any documents in this case. (McDonagh, Christina) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 0101-7514427 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Oscar H Menjivar Ortega. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rado, Rachel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.