Bornstein v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Harriet L. Bornstein
Defendant: Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2019cv10199
Filed: January 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Richard G Stearns
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 30, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Harriet L. Bornstein. (Attachments: #1 cover letter)(Pushner, Benjamin)
January 30, 2019 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Richard G. Stearns assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (Finn, Mary)
January 30, 2019 Filing 3 Online access to documents in this case is limited to counsel of record only. All documents are available for review in the Office of the Clerk. Counsel of record: please note that you will need to log into CM/ECF to access any documents in this case. (Jones, Sherry)
January 30, 2019 Filing 2 Notice of correction to docket made by Court staff. Correction: Counsel filed the motion to proceed in forma pauperis as an attachment to the complaint. This should be filed as a separate entry using the event "Motion" and "Proceed in Forma Pauperis". Counsel should now file the motion. (Jones, Sherry)
January 30, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill (Fee Status: IFP requested), filed by Harriet L. Bornstein. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form, #3 Addendum to Complaint, #4 In Forma Pauperis Application Cover, #5 In Forma Pauperis Application, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 27 ALJ Decision, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 29 Request for Reconsideration, #8 Exhibit Exhibit 30 Request for Review of Decision, #9 Exhibit Exhibit A ALJ Fulton Decision, #10 Exhibit Exhibit B Appeals Council Brief, #11 Exhibit Exhibit C Appeals Council Denial, #12 Exhibit Exhibit D Appeals Council Civil Action Deadline, #13 General Cover Letter, #14 Summons to U.S. Attorney, #15 Summons to Regional Chief Counsel, #16 Summons to U.S. Attorney General)(Pushner, Benjamin) (Attachment 2 replaced on 1/30/2019) (Jones, Sherry).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bornstein v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Christopher Michaels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Harriet L. Bornstein
Represented By: Benjamin A. Pushner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?