Melo v. Neep Investors Holdings LLC et al
| Andres Ramon Melo |
| Neep Investors Holdings LLC and ICOB Burlington, LLC |
| 1:2019cv10317 |
| February 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Denise J Casper |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Judge Denise J. Casper: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint, ICOB Burlington, LLC answer due 5/13/2019. (Hourihan, Lisa) |
| Filing 14 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to 5/13/19 to File Answer by ICOB Burlington, LLC.(Duggan, Stephen) |
| Filing 13 Judge Denise J. Casper: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading to 5/13/19 (Hourihan, Lisa) |
| Filing 12 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, by Neep Investors Holdings LLC.(Steinberg, Michael) |
| Filing 11 Judge Denise J. Casper: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint to 4/11/19. (Hourihan, Lisa) |
| Filing 10 First MOTION for Extension of Time to 4/11/19 to File Answer to Complaint by ICOB Burlington, LLC.(Duggan, Stephen) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen A. Duggan on behalf of ICOB Burlington, LLC (Duggan, Stephen) |
| Filing 8 Judge Denise J. Casper: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint, Neep Investors Holdings LLC answer due 4/11/2019. (Hourihan, Lisa) |
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to through and including April 11, 2019 to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Neep Investors Holdings LLC.(Steinberg, Michael) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael E. Steinberg on behalf of Neep Investors Holdings LLC (Steinberg, Michael) |
| Filing 5 Judge Denise J. Casper: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Todd W. Shulby. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register for electronic filing if the attorney does not already have an ECF account in this district. To register go to the Court website at www.mad.uscourts.gov. Select Case Information, then Electronic Filing (CM/ECF) and go to the CM/ECF Registration Form. (McKillop, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Todd W. Shulby, Esq. Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number 0101-7564926 by Andres Ramon Melo. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 FL Bar Letter of Good Standing)(Garno, Edward) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to ICOB Burlington, LLC, Neep Investors Holdings LLC. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (McKillop, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Denise J. Casper assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ICOB Burlington, LLC, Neep Investors Holdings LLC Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7545375 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Andres Ramon Melo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Garno, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
